Tuesday, 31 May 2016

Eye in the sky with Helen Mirren.

Sometimes, I wander off to the cinema on a Thursday night and watch a film. And sometimes, I write a review for the film afterward that Salient chooses not to publish (ty).


The movie’s good, and it sort of slipped under the cracks a little. It’s understated, methodical, and chances are that you may forget that nothing has even exploded yet. The film is set over the course of a single day, as a joint British-US-Kenya military operation commanded by Colonel Katherine Powell (Helen Mirren) looks to identify several key Al-Shabab leaders and eliminate them before they can recruit two new members, one a British and the other an American citizen. It then deals with the ramifications of using drone warfare, particularly its effects on citizens, and the viewpoints towards this new type of action, etc. So all in all, a real “feel good” kind of motion picture.

It goes to great lengths to establish the complexity of the operations: cutting between the UAV pilots in one area, forensics people in another, Ms Mirren arguing with her superiors somewhere else, and the Kenyan army on standby. While the editing has a difficult job to keep track through several hard cuts, thankfully it’s held together and you remember the role of each individual. If there were any mild complaints about the film, some brief injections of humour in the film feel out of place, and their only function is to continually delay the decision-making process. Additionally the focus on civilians feels a little too melodramatic, particularly towards the end.

Otherwise, it’s a well-constructed film that makes watching several monitor screens strangely compelling, and even tense in parts. As far as “day in the life” films about drones go, it’s probably the best one I’ve seen. It’s good to see a film actually play with your expectations about what outcome it may or may not take, and one that isn’t pushing 150 minutes in length like most modern contemporaries. Also, kudos to Alan Rickman for his performance in one of his last films. As unlikely as it sounds, it would have been great to see you reprise the role of Hans Gruber again.





Saturday, 7 May 2016

Star Trek IV.

Happy (really late) May the 4th.

I may have bailed on this one due to the side effects of somewhat excessive alcohol consumption, and by saying “I may have”, I really mean “I did”. Please accept this apology in the form of a flattering and professionally crafted treatise concerning the aforementioned 1986 film Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home in the meantime, whilst I prepare a gift package for myself:

"It’s the one with the whales in it. In all honesty, this could be one of the greatest and most enjoyable motion pictures ever made, at least on par with anything made by Godard, Truffaut, Lean etc. As I transported myself away from the scene of Spock nerve-pinching a punk rocker on a San Francisco bus, I inevitably entered the mind of a young child on a Saturday morning watching TV, because this film is best made to be watched in the early hours of the weekend.”



CHEKOV HUMILIATION 4: Renews tensions between the Cold War’s biggest superpowers, damages one of San Francisco’s wharfs courtesy of a sustained head injury, and likely affects the infrastructure and schedule of one of the city’s busiest hospitals.